🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to employ the maps established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling occurs during a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders criticized the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party election organization.

A leading Democratic leader argued the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.