🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and harvest that and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.