🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to erase Black history and legacy from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.